Free will, moral responsibility and automatisms

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract Some determinist approaches to free will opine that the human brain is subordinate physical laws not fully under our control. This results in a weakening of concept personal autonomy and moral responsibility humans. Were we acknowledge this assumption, might consider automatic machines unable influence thoughts intentions from which actions take root. The key issue lies fact an individual does consciously engage particular (automatisms), challenges individual’s complex behaviour. Despite issue, all automatisms lack conscious can be viewed as lacking will. paper examines whether classical philosophical concepts may weaken strict approach, seeks deny individuals have due existence actions.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Free Will and Moral Responsibility in Islamic Philosophy

According to a common view among Muslim philosophers, a moral agent has free will if and only if she is able to do an action when she wants to and is able to avoid it when she wants otherwise. Implicit in this view is the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP). On the other hand, according to this view, free will is dependent on requirements such as conception, judgement, tendency, decisi...

متن کامل

Moral psychology, vol. 4: free will and moral responsibility.

ISSN: 1354-6805 (Print) 1464-0619 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/pcnp20 Moral psychology, vol. 4: free will and moral responsibility David E.J. Linden To cite this article: David E.J. Linden (2015) Moral psychology, vol. 4: free will and moral responsibility, Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 20:5, 469-472, DOI: 10.1080/13546805.2015.1073470 To link to this article: http://d...

متن کامل

Traditional and Experimental Approaches to Free Will and Moral Responsibility

claims, and less familiar with what has been said and argued? True, both compatibilist and incompatibilist philosophers have made claims about what ordinary people believe about free will and moral responsibility (for examples, see Nahmias et al. 2006, 29– 30), and such claims are best tested empirically. What is not clear is how much stock philosophers should put in such ordinary beliefs. Acco...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Ethics & bioethics

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2453-7829', '1338-5615']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2023-0006